From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rudack v. Valentine

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1937
10 N.E.2d 577 (N.Y. 1937)

Opinion

Submitted May 26, 1937

Decided June 11, 1937

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York County.

Joseph G. Fenster for appellant.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Francis J. Bloustein and Paxton Blair of counsel), for Lewis J. Valentine et al., respondents.

Harold Riegelman, H.H. Nordlinger and Jacob M. Dinnes for League of Mutual Taxi Owners, Inc., et al., interveners, respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Rudack v. Valentine

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1937
10 N.E.2d 577 (N.Y. 1937)
Case details for

Matter of Rudack v. Valentine

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MEYER RUDACK, Appellant, against LEWIS J. VALENTINE, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 11, 1937

Citations

10 N.E.2d 577 (N.Y. 1937)
10 N.E.2d 577

Citing Cases

People v. Pfingst

Such forced investiture with a public interest, as already observed, would be contrary to applicable and…

Schneider v. Orangetown

One may ask, why should all taxpayers be responsible for repair of pipe used exclusively by the plaintiffs?…