Opinion
April 19, 1977
Order, Family Court, New York County, entered on December 23, 1976, denying respondent-appellant's motion to dismiss this support proceeding and cancel and annul all prior orders entered herein, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and motion granted in all respects. The parties entered into a separation agreement on June 2, 1970 and obtained a Mexican divorce decree on June 20, 1970. The terms of the separation agreement pursuant to which petitioner waived her right to support were incorporated by reference, without merger, into the Mexican decree. Thereafter, the Family Court granted two support orders in favor of petitioner. At the time of the issuance of those orders the parties were no longer married and, accordingly, the Family Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction and the validity of the separation agreement is irrelevant to the jurisdictional issue presently raised. Nor does the fact relied upon by the Family Court, that the original support order was entered herein prior to the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Silver v Silver ( 36 N.Y.2d 324), detract from the settled law that since the Mexican court had personal jurisdiction over petitioner, no right to support can survive except as awarded by the final decree of divorce (Lappert v Lappert, 20 N.Y.2d 364, 367). In Matter of Silver v Silver (supra, p 327), the court held: "We do not think that the Legislature intended to empower the Family Court to order support or alimony in a situation where the spouse is not currently entitled to any support or alimony at all under the existing foreign divorce decree."
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Lupiano and Capozzoli, JJ.