From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roulo v. Roulo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 4, 1994

Appeal from the Allegany County Family Court, Sprague, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The parties are parents of three children, a daughter born in 1983, another daughter born in 1984, and a son born in 1988. After a hearing held on October 1, 1991 and March 2, 1992, the court awarded custody of the oldest and youngest children to the father and of the middle child to the mother. That constituted a continuation of the arrangement existing when the hearing concluded.

The mother contends on appeal that the court abused its discretion in awarding custody of two of the children to the father because it based its award on a finding that no extreme adverse effects had been observed from that arrangement, an improper standard.

The applicable standard is the best interests of the children (see, Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89, 93-95). While keeping children together is often in the best interests of all of them, the court must be cognizant of the individual needs of each child (see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 172-173). The court made extensive factual findings, supported by the record, that warrant the conclusion that the needs of each of the children will best be met by the court's disposition.


Summaries of

Matter of Roulo v. Roulo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Roulo v. Roulo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID A. ROULO, SR., Respondent, v. TERRI L. ROULO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 760

Citing Cases

Suzanne T. v. Arthur L.T

nge in an existing custodial arrangement is in the best interests of children, including (1) the individual…

Suzanne T. v. Arthur L. T.

d expressed desires of the children; (2) the need of the children to live with siblings; (3) the continuity…