From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rosenbush v. Keller

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1936
271 N.Y. 282 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1936

Decided May 26, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Samuel Plumer for appellant.

Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel ( Edmund L. Palmieri and Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent.


Appellant was not entitled to resort to the remedy of mandamus without availing herself of the right to appeal to the Board of Standards and Appeals. ( Matter of Towers Management Corp. v. Thatcher, 271 N.Y. 94; decided May 19, 1936.) That Board is also empowered on a proper application to consider the argument here made on the basis of unnecessary hardship. (Amended Building Zone Resolution, § 21; see New York Code of Ordinances, Appendix B.)

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Rosenbush v. Keller

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 26, 1936
271 N.Y. 282 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Matter of Rosenbush v. Keller

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EVA ROSENBUSH, Appellant, against FRANK C. KELLER, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 26, 1936

Citations

271 N.Y. 282 (N.Y. 1936)
2 N.E.2d 659

Citing Cases

Suburban Club v. Tn. of Huntington

Under the holding of the Appellate Division and of the Court of Appeals, in that case, the permit could not…

Sweet v. Campbell

"As the petitioner failed to first exhaust its remedy by appeal to the Board of Appeals, the peremptory order…