From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rose v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 1997
239 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 27, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bellantoni, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that a public employer may abolish civil service positions for the purposes of economy or efficiency (see, Matter of Aldazabal v. Carey, 44 N.Y.2d 787; Matter of Rosenthal v Gilroy, 208 A.D.2d 748, 748-749; Matter of Della Vecchia v. Town of N. Hempstead, 207 A.D.2d 484; Matter of Bianco v. Pitts, 200 A.D.2d 741). It is also well settled that the one who challenges the validity of such an act has the burden of proving that the employer did not act in good faith in abolishing the position (see, Matter of Rosenthal v. Gilroy, supra; Della Vecchia v. Town of N. Hempstead, supra; Matter of Bianco v. Pitts, supra; Matter of Crow v. Ambach, 96 A.D.2d 642; Matter of Connolly v. Carey, 80 A.D.2d 936). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the petitioner had failed to sustain his burden of proving that the respondent did not act in good faith (see, Matter of Della Vecchia v. Town of N. Hempstead, supra; Matter of Bianco v. Pitts, supra).

Miller, J.P., Ritter, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Rose v. City of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 1997
239 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Rose v. City of Newburgh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES R. ROSE, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEWBURGH, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 986

Citing Cases

In re Disanza v. T. Bd. of T. of Cortlandt

DECISION ORDER A public employer may abolish civil service positions for the purpose of economy or efficiency…

Eugenio v. City of Yonkers

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. “[A] public employer may abolish civil service positions…