From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roe v. New York Foundling Hospital

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1970
261 N.E.2d 111 (N.Y. 1970)

Opinion

Argued May 11, 1970

Decided May 14, 1970

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HYMAN KORN, J.

William P. Ford, Donald J. Zoeller and Thomas R. Esposito for appellant.

Phillip F. Solomon for respondent.

Helen L. Buttenwieser, John H. Olding and Shad Polier for Community Council of Greater New York, amicus curiae. Leonard C. Koldin and Philip C. Pinsky for Onondaga County Department of Social Services, amicus curiae.


Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. It is contrary to public policy to stipulate for judgment absolute, in this case involving the custody of a child, where the resulting disposition on the law could be contrary to what may be factually determined to be in the best interests of the child (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp. 286-287).


Summaries of

Roe v. New York Foundling Hospital

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1970
261 N.E.2d 111 (N.Y. 1970)
Case details for

Roe v. New York Foundling Hospital

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARY ROE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 14, 1970

Citations

261 N.E.2d 111 (N.Y. 1970)
261 N.E.2d 111
312 N.Y.S.2d 1002

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Wessell v. N.Y. Foundling Hosp

Such purported subsequent events bearing as they do on the welfare of the child are a proper subject of…

Roe v. New York Foundling Hospital

McNALLY, J. This custody proceeding was before us on petitioner's appeal from an order of March 19, 1969…