Opinion
May 28, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.).
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated October 5, 1994, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated December 14, 1994, made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated December 14, 1994, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the application to serve an amended notice of claim ( see, General Municipal Law § 50-e; Serrano v. City of New York, 143 A.D.2d 652, 653). O'Brien, J.P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.