Opinion
October 19, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioners' contention, the determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal rejecting their petition as an impermissible collateral attack on a 1978 order of decontrol was not arbitrary or capricious ( see, CPLR 7803; Matter of Ansonia Residents Assn. v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 75 N.Y.2d 206; Linick v. Key Realty Co., 147 A.D.2d 388, 391; Matter of Melohn v. Joy, 60 A.D.2d 579; see also, Matter of Plaza Realty Investors v. Aponte, 198 A.D.2d 164; Matter of Frankel Realty Co. v. New York State Div. of Hous. Community Renewal, 176 A.D.2d 617). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
O'Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.