From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roberts v. Yellow Cab of Watertown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1970
35 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

December 21, 1970


Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed May 14, 1969. The issues are whether an employer-employee relationship existed, and whether an industrial accident occurred. The board found that decedent worked under the supervision and direction of the dispatcher of the employer and that an empolyer-employee relationship existed. ( Matter of Gennarelli v. Spruce-Up Cleaners, 34 A.D.2d 1075; Matter of Gregg v. Dallas Mavis Forwarding Co., 32 A.D.2d 678.) The board also found that decedent "lifted and carried the mail bags, at least one of which weighed about seventy-five pounds, and which precipitated the ruptured aortic aneurysm, thereby constituting an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. The resultant death was causally related to the accidental injury." Claimant's hearsay testimony is sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of other witnesses to meet the requirement of section 118 of the Workmen's Compensation Law. ( Matter of Keller v. Montgomery Ward Co., 2 A.D.2d 402.) The board's determination is supported by substantial evidence and should be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Herlihy, P.J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Roberts v. Yellow Cab of Watertown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1970
35 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Matter of Roberts v. Yellow Cab of Watertown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GERALDINE ROBERTS, Respondent, v. YELLOW CAB…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1970

Citations

35 A.D.2d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Matter of Sepulveda v. Fischl Bros. Button Co.

The question of whether claimant was an employee is a question of fact within the sole province of the board…

Matter of Leader v. Holland Farms, Inc.

We disagree. In our view there is sufficient other evidence and circumstances to provide the necessary…