Opinion
June 2, 1997
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency and according it the benefit of every reasonable inference ( cf., People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620; Matter of William A., 219 A.D.2d 494, 495), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, People v. Beecher, 225 A.D.2d 943; People v. Pumarejo, 222 A.D.2d 616; Matter of Nevada FF., 214 A.D.2d 814, 815). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, Matter of Frederick QQ, 209 A.D.2d 832, 833).
O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.