From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Robbins v. Frohlich

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 23, 1952
106 N.E.2d 65 (N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

Submitted March 11, 1952

Decided April 23, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Bernard F. Farley for appellants.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Daniel Polansky, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.


Order of Appellate Division and award of Workmen's Compensation Board reversed and claim dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence to sustain the finding that the employee's death resulted from an accidental injury suffered while he was engaged upon his work. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. CONWAY and DYE, JJ., dissent upon the ground that there is ample evidence to support the finding of the Workmen's Compensation Board that there was a causal relationship between the employee's accident and his death.


Summaries of

Matter of Robbins v. Frohlich

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 23, 1952
106 N.E.2d 65 (N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Matter of Robbins v. Frohlich

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PURCELL ROBBINS, Respondent, against GEORGE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 23, 1952

Citations

106 N.E.2d 65 (N.Y. 1952)
106 N.E.2d 65

Citing Cases

Matter of Sullivan v. B a Constr., Inc.

An award is, therefore, warranted only if the automobile accident and the consequent injuries resulted…

Matter of Maricle v. Glazier

After that he was completely blind. The causal connection between the subsequent suicide and his complete…