From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rivette v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1942
265 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 18, 1942.


Decision handed down November 11, 1942 [ ante, p. 89], corrected to read as follows: Order reversed on the law and application for peremptory mandamus granted, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by Schenck, J. Hill, P.J., Crapser and Foster, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents in a memorandum.


I dissent and vote to affirm on the authority of People ex rel. Dolan v. Lane ( 55 N.Y. 217). Mary Hertzel is now actually filling the office. It is contended that her only claim to the office is an invalid appointment by the Board of Fire Commissioners, but Mary Hertzel is not a party to this proceeding and has not had an opportunity to be heard. The respondents apparently believe that the office is now filled because they refuse to appoint some one else to it. If there is a serious question as to the title to the office it ought not to be decided against a party in possession in a proceeding in which he has no opportunity to be heard. Mandamus is not the proper remedy in such a case. ( People ex rel. Dolan v. Lane, supra.)


Summaries of

Matter of Rivette v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 1942
265 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Rivette v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CLIFTON F. RIVETTE, Appellant, against JOHN L. BAKER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 894 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)