Opinion
July 13, 2000.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 24, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
Michelle Rhode, Port Washington, appellant in person.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Carmen R. Torrent of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Claimant is the sole officer and shareholder of a real estate company incorporated on March 7, 1997 as a subchapter S corporation. This business was run out of claimant's home. At the time the business was incorporated, claimant was employed with an investment company. Claimant subsequently ended employment with this company under nondisqualifying circumstances in April 1997 and filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because she was not totally unemployed.
The record reveals that claimant, while receiving unemployment insurance benefits, purchased a computer, a corporate kit, office equipment, office supplies and opened a cellular phone account. As claimant stood to gain financially from her activities in furtherance of the operation of the business, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision denying claimant unemployment insurance benefits nothwithstanding the fact that the corporation was not profitable (see, Matter of Bezdezowksi [Commissioner of Labor], 271 A.D.2d 794, 706 N.Y.S.2d 212). Furthermore, inasmuch as claimant failed to report these business activities despite having attended an orientation and receiving instructions explaining the unemployment insurance reporting requirements, the finding that she made willful false statements to obtain benefits is supported by substantial evidence and properly recoverable (see, Matter of Donaghy [Commissioner of Labor], 264 A.D.2d 883). Claimant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.