From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Reubens v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1993
194 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 29, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.).


Since petitioner did not appeal the denial of his request for "individual" data within 30 days (Public Officers Law § 89 [a]), he failed to exhaust his administrative remedy, and therefore cannot secure such information through judicial relief (Matter of Murphy v. New York State Educ. Dept., 148 A.D.2d 160, 164-165). Concerning the request for "aggregate" data, since nothing in the Freedom of Information Law, aside from two exceptions not relevant here, "shall be construed to require any entity to prepare any records not possessed or maintained by such entity" (Public Officers Law § 89), respondent is under no obligation to compile the requested data from the documents or records in its possession (Matter of Guerrier v Hernandez-Cuebas, 165 A.D.2d 218, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 853).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Reubens v. Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 29, 1993
194 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Reubens v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JACK REUBENS, Appellant, v. KAY C. MURRAY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 580

Citing Cases

Upturn, Inc. v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't

Empire Ctr. for Pub. Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435 [1st Dept 2020], appeal…

People v. Seeley

In failing to do so, the defendant has not exhausted her administrative remedies. Her request under FOIL must…