Opinion
November 13, 1997
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Claimant was employed as an airline mechanic. Anticipating that the work of his department was to be "outsourced" (i.e., performed by outside companies), claimant resigned, taking advantage of the employer's early retirement incentive program. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he left his employment without good cause. We affirm. It has been held that an individual who opts to participate in an early retirement incentive program when there is continuing work available has left his or her employment under disqualifying circumstances ( see, Matter of Raphael [Sweeney], 239 A.D.2d 652; Matter of Russo [Sweeney], 235 A.D.2d 895). We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's ruling ( see generally, Matter of Fisher [Levine], 36 N.Y.2d 146).
Mercure, J.P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.