Opinion
August 15, 1994
Appeal from the Family Court, Kings County (McLeod, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In Matter of Jose R. ( 83 N.Y.2d 388), the Court of Appeals explicitly rejected "wholesale dismissals on a per se basis for speedy disposition lapses, irrespective of the reasons for the time lapse", holding that, "[e]ven assuming an overarching speedy dispositional phase right does pertain, the Family Court Act does not correspondingly direct dismissal relief for a lapse in that regard" (Matter of Jose R., supra, at 393-394; cf., Matter of Christopher WW., 189 A.D.2d 411; Matter of Faruq F., 186 A.D.2d 799; Matter of Roshon P., 182 A.D.2d 346). Accordingly, the appellant's contentions are without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.