From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Reese

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Jun 2, 1930
141 Misc. 428 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1930)

Opinion

June 2, 1930.

Murray, Aldrich Webb, for the petitioner..

Olcott, Holmes, Glass, Paul Havens [ William Polglase of counsel], for Thomas Reese.

Carter, Ledyard Milburn, for the respondent Dr. Algernon B. Reese.


In this accounting proceeding a question arises as to the amount of income which is payable to the widow as life tenant of the residuary trust. Counsel for the widow contends that the method of computation laid down in Matter of Benson ( 96 N.Y. 499) should not be followed, and argues that the gross income earned during the period of administration should be paid to the life tenant. These contentions must be overruled. The rule of ascertainment of income in the Benson case has been uniformly followed by the surrogates and the appellate courts in arriving at the true residue of an estate and the amount of net income payable from the date of death to the cestui of the trust. ( Matter of Brokaw, 165 N.Y.S. 700; Matter of Emery, 134 Misc. 714; Matter of Brookfield, 109 id. 345; Williamson v. Williamson, 6 Paige, 298.) It provides a fair and equitable allocation of gross income between the life tenant and remaindermen. ( Matter of Phillips, 128 Misc. 896.) It does not offend against the statute prohibiting accumulations, for the true net income is paid from the date of death and the true principal, constituting the residuary trust fund, is set up. Only recently my decision in Matter of Lord ( 134 Misc. 198), which applied the rule of the Benson case, was affirmed by the Appellate Division, First Department, without opinion ( 228 A.D. 771). I find no evidence of intent on the part of the testator here in his will to depart from this well-established rule, nor do I find any expressed or implied purpose to give the widow the gross or entire income earned by the general assets of the estate. Cases have occurred where that intent was plainly and clearly defined. The gift to the wife here was simply a direction to pay to her "the income derived" from the residue. The provisions of the will, therefore, contemplated the ascertainment of the residue under the customary method.

The claim for computation of the income asserted by the widow must, therefore, be overruled. Submit decree on notice settling the account and construing the will accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Reese

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Jun 2, 1930
141 Misc. 428 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1930)
Case details for

Matter of Reese

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of ROBERT C. REESE, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Jun 2, 1930

Citations

141 Misc. 428 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1930)
252 N.Y.S. 197

Citing Cases

Matter of Summerson

March, 1932. Present — Finch, P.J., Merrell, McAvoy, Sherman and Townley, JJ. [ 141 Misc. 428.] Decree so far…

Matter of Foster

The general rule that income derived from funds used for the payment of debts, administration expenses and…