From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Raynor v. Yardarm Club Hotel, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1969
32 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

June 9, 1969


In a proceeding (1) to restrain appellant Richard Whitney, the president and principal stockholder of appellant Yardarm Club Hotel, Inc., from paying out corporate funds to himself, his family and to others, including personal creditors and (2) to permit petitioner and his accountant to inspect books and records of the appellant corporation and to make copies and extracts thereof, the appeal is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated July 31, 1968, as granted the application to the extent of permitting petitioner and his accountant to inspect the books and records of the corporation from January 1, 1962 to "the present date", and to make copies and extracts thereof at petitioner's own cost and expense. Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, even if we were to go so far as to assume that there is an issue of fact present as to petitioner's good faith in instituting this proceeding, the burden would not be on him to demonstrate his good faith but on the appellant corporation to show his bad faith (5 Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporations [Perm. ed.], § 2220, pp. 816-817; Matter of Tate v. Sonotone Corp., 272 App. Div. 103). However, since the affidavits submitted by appellants in opposition to the proceeding completely failed to refute his allegations that they had violated several provisions of the Business Corporation Law (e.g., § 602, subd. [b], which requires annual meetings of shareholders, and appellants have held but one such meeting in the last six years; § 703, subd. [a], which requires that directors be elected at each annual shareholders' meeting, to hold office until the next annual meeting, and there is no indication in the affidavits that any such elections have been held in the six-year period in question), in our opinion Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the petition to the indicated extent (Business Corporation Law, § 624, subd. [d]; cf. Matter of Ochs v. Washington Hgts. Fed. Sav. Loan Assn., 17 N.Y.2d 82, 86; Matter of Cohen v. Cocoline Prods., 309 N.Y. 119; Matter of Breswick Co. v. Greater N.Y. Inds., 308 N.Y. 1041; Matter of Steinway, 159 N.Y. 250; Matter of Gottdenker v. Philadelphia Reading Corp., 31 A.D.2d 152; Matter of Tate v. Sonotone Corp., 272 App. Div. 103, supra; Matter of Schulman v. Dejonge Co., 270 App. Div. 147; Matter of Young v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 28 Misc.2d 512). Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Raynor v. Yardarm Club Hotel, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1969
32 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Matter of Raynor v. Yardarm Club Hotel, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of J. MADISON RAYNOR, Respondent, v. YARDARM CLUB HOTEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1969

Citations

32 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
302 N.Y.S.2d 353

Citing Cases

Pomerance v. McGrath

The parties also dispute whether plaintiff is entitled to receive paper and electronic copies of records. As…

Matter of Marcato

On the contrary, appellants [corporation] have the burden of proving the bad faith on his part which they…