From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ray v. Woodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 20, 1997
244 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 20, 1997

Appeal from the Family Court of Otsego County (Coccoma, J.).


Predicated upon the parties' stipulation, Family Court entered an order on September 8, 1995 directing respondent not to relocate her residence from a certain address in Oneida County and not to disenroll the parties' child from the school he was attending without further order of the court. On September 18, 1995, petitioner filed a violation petition, claiming that respondent had moved in disregard of Family Court's order. After an evidentiary hearing, Family Court found that respondent had disobeyed its order by relocating her residence and changing the child's school without first obtaining a court order. Family Court then proceeded to hold respondent in civil contempt and directed her to perform 200 hours of community service. Respondent appeals.

Family Court also issued two orders defining the parties' rights and responsibilities respecting the child. Respondent has not pursued her appeals of these orders and her attorney has filed an affidavit in which he avers there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on respondent's appeal. Thus we deem these appeals abandoned ( see, Richardson v. Richardson, 186 A.D.2d 946, 947).

While the record reveals that respondent willfully violated Family Court's clear and explicit order, we cannot sustain its contempt finding since petitioner did not show that respondent's conduct defeated, impaired, impeded or prejudiced his rights since the one period of visitation he missed was attributable to the child's hospitalization ( see, McCain v. Dinkins, 84 N.Y.2d 216, 226; Matter of Hoglund v. Hoglund, 234 A.D.2d 794; compare, Matter of Beers v. Beers, 220 A.D.2d 839, 842). Accordingly, we reverse.

Mikoll, J. P., Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order finding respondent in contempt is reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed. Ordered that the appeals from the remaining two orders are dismissed, as abandoned, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Ray v. Woodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 20, 1997
244 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Ray v. Woodman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter or RICHARD A. RAY, Respondent, v. JULIE M. WOODMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 378

Citing Cases

Matter of King v. King

With respect to the various factors considered by the court (see, Fox v. Fox, supra, at 210), we conclude…

Dwyer v. Torre

uly 17, 1998 without Liam. Over the next two weeks, plaintiff made no attempt to contact Liam. Although we…