Opinion
April 20, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edith Miller, J.).
The respondents' determination to impose a penalty of 18 months reincarceration after the petitioner violated his parole by moving to New Jersey and not reporting to his parole officer for more than three months was not "so irrational as to border on impropriety" (People ex rel. Herbert v New York State Bd. of Parole, 97 A.D.2d 128, 133). While neither the Parole Board's decision nor the Hearing Officer's recommendation incorporated all the relevant factors previously raised, it is presumed that they were considered and, under the circumstances, the basis for the decision was sufficiently detailed (People ex rel. Haderxhanji v New York State Bd. of Parole, 97 A.D.2d 368). We have considered all other claims raised by the petitioner and find them to be meritless.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.