From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Prince v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 10, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Denman, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The record supports the court's determination that petitioner, an inmate at Attica Correctional Facility, was not deprived of an employee assistant prior to his disciplinary hearing. Moreover, petitioner has failed to demonstrate that any lack of assistance may have deprived him of due process (see, Matter of Wright v. Scully, 124 A.D.2d 805; Matter of Valles v Smith, 116 A.D.2d 1002, revd on other grounds 69 N.Y.2d 677).

The written misbehavior report by itself constituted substantial evidence (People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130). The essential issue at the hearing was credibility, and the Hearing Officer was entitled to credit the charging officer's report (Matter of Curl v. Kelly, 125 A.D.2d 948).


Summaries of

Matter of Prince v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1987
134 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Prince v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ERROL PRINCE, Petitioner, v. WALTER KELLY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Matter of Caraballo v. Kelly

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Boomer, Pine and Balio, JJ. Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, Matter of…

Matter of Bernacet v. Coughlin

We also find no support for his claim that he requested his assistant to provide him with certain documents.…