From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Plunkett v. Flynn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1995
220 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 23, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Garry, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the proceeding is dismissed, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to restore the name of Terrence R. Flynn, Sr., to the appropriate ballot.

The trial court erred in finding that the certificate of nomination, which nominated the candidate for the office of "Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Assigned Vacancy Number 8, Queens County", did not accurately describe the title of the public office being sought (see, Election Law § 6-128). There was no impairment of the ability of the Board of Elections to ascertain the correct vacancy in office to which the certificate of nomination pertained ( see, Matter of Donnelly v. McNab, 83 A.D.2d 896). Copertino, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.


The office in question was that of Judge of the Civil Court, Fifth Municipal Court District, Queens County. However, the certificate of nomination described the office as "Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Assigned Vacancy Number 8, Queens County". Under these circumstances, the trial court's holding that the certificate of nomination failed to properly describe the title of the office sought was correct (cf., Matter of Korman v. Strohm, 145 Misc.2d 34, 36, affd 153 A.D.2d 539).


Summaries of

Matter of Plunkett v. Flynn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1995
220 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Plunkett v. Flynn

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARY J. PLUNKETT et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 645

Citing Cases

In re Appl. of Cadel v. Suffolk Cty. Bd. of Elect.

The rule is well settled that a petition is not invalid if part of the description of the public office is…