From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Plum v. Plum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1995
216 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 5, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the mother's contention, the New York Family Court properly declined to exercise its jurisdiction in this case (see, Domestic Relations Law §§ 75-b, 75-d [d] [i]; § 75-g). The record indicates that the father commenced an action for dissolution of the parties' marriage in the Colorado District Court and that he obtained an order temporarily restraining the mother from removing the parties' minor children from Colorado. The record also indicates that, when the New York Family Court discussed the issue of jurisdiction with the Colorado District Court, it was clear that the Colorado District Court had already exercised its jurisdiction over the custody matter and that it did not intend to relinquish jurisdiction. Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Plum v. Plum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1995
216 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Plum v. Plum

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KENNETH PLUM, Respondent, v. JOELLEN PLUM, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 451

Citing Cases

Michael v. Manuela

Of course, this would only encourage the mother to flee to Italy to act on her claim of abuse against the…

Matter of Hagzan-Pfaff v. Braisted

Further, there was no evidence that the Florida court intended to relinquish its jurisdiction ( see, Domestic…