From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Pinkwater v. Joseph

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 6, 1950
300 N.Y. 729 (N.Y. 1950)

Summary

In Matter of Pinkwater v Joseph (300 NY 729 [1950]), the Court of Appeals affirmed, without opinion, an order of the Appellate Division confirming a determination by the City Comptroller that laundry workers were not entitled to prevailing wages.

Summary of this case from Ansah v. A.W.I. Sec. & Investigation

Opinion

Argued March 2, 1950

Decided April 6, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

T. Robert Gabrielli for Leo Pinkwater and others, appellants.

David A. Savage and Donald A. Savage for Sadie Cavanagh and others, appellants.

John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel ( Howard C. Fischbach and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Pinkwater v. Joseph

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 6, 1950
300 N.Y. 729 (N.Y. 1950)

In Matter of Pinkwater v Joseph (300 NY 729 [1950]), the Court of Appeals affirmed, without opinion, an order of the Appellate Division confirming a determination by the City Comptroller that laundry workers were not entitled to prevailing wages.

Summary of this case from Ansah v. A.W.I. Sec. & Investigation

In Matter of Pinkwater v Joseph (300 NY 729 [1950]), the Court of Appeals affirmed, without opinion, an order of the Appellate Division confirming a determination by the City Comptroller that laundry workers were not entitled to prevailing wages.

Summary of this case from Ansah v. A.W.I. Sec. & Investigation, Inc.
Case details for

Matter of Pinkwater v. Joseph

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEO PINKWATER et al., Appellants, against LAZARUS JOSEPH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 6, 1950

Citations

300 N.Y. 729 (N.Y. 1950)
92 N.E.2d 62

Citing Cases

Matter of Miele v. Joseph

The test to be applied in determining what is public work is rather function than magnitude. It is not easy…

Brukhman v. Giuliani

Plaintiffs would displace this cogent documentation and would replace it with a sweeping re-categorization…