Opinion
Argued October 19, 1920
Decided November 16, 1920
Horace G. Pierce for appellants.
Eugene Van Voorhis for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Pardee v. Rayfield
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 16, 1920
130 N.E. 886 (N.Y. 1920)
Summaries of
Matter of Pardee v. Rayfield
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 16, 1920
130 N.E. 886 (N.Y. 1920)
Case details for
Matter of Pardee v. Rayfield
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of G. HERBERT PARDEE, on Behalf of…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 16, 1920
Citations
130 N.E. 886 (N.Y. 1920)
130 N.E. 886
Citing Cases
Vandeweghe v. City of New York
I do not believe that we can take away from a State the arbitrary right to tax even property which had…
Town of Irondequoit v. County of Monroe"What it could have dispensed with lawfully in the beginning, it may dispense with lawfully in the end." (…