From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Palacz v. Palacz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 1998
249 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 29, 1998

Appeal from Order of Livingston County Family Court, Cicoria, J. — Visitation.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not err in dismissing the petition alleging that Richard Palacz (respondent) violated the visitation provisions of a prior order by his conduct on January 7, 1997. Under the circumstances, no hearing was required (see, Bowie v. Bowie, 182 A.D.2d 1049, 1050). We agree with the court's conclusion that the single alleged violation apparently arising from a conflict between the visitation schedule and the child's academic needs, if established, would be too insubstantial to support the conclusion that respondent "defeated, impaired, impeded, or prejudiced" petitioner's visitation rights (Judiciary Law § 753 [A]) and thus would not warrant the imposition of sanctions. The court's admonition to respondent was sufficient in this instance.


Summaries of

Matter of Palacz v. Palacz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 1998
249 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Palacz v. Palacz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELLEN PALACZ, Appellant, v. RICHARD PALACZ et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 575

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. Smith

Here, there is a factual dispute whether respondent undermined visitation. Thus, because the petition…

Lisa B.I. v. Carl D.I

Indeed, it was undisputed that there were significant periods of time in which the uncle had failed to comply…