From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Our Lady of Good Counsel R.C. Ch. v. Ball

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 22, 1975
345 N.E.2d 338 (N.Y. 1975)

Summary

allowing standing to plaintiffs that would be hurt by increased competition

Summary of this case from Taxicab Serv. Ass'n v. State

Opinion

Submitted November 25, 1975

Decided December 22, 1975

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, THEODORE G. BARLOW, J.

John S. Zachary for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (A. Seth Greenwald, Samuel A. Hirshowitz and David H. Berman of counsel), for Ira M. Ball, as Commissioner of the State Bingo Control Commission, and another, respondents.

David M. Schwartz and Robert J. Fishman for Victory Hall, Inc., respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by Mr. Justice M. HENRY MARTUSCELLO at the Appellate Division ( 45 A.D.2d 66).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

Matter of Our Lady of Good Counsel R.C. Ch. v. Ball

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 22, 1975
345 N.E.2d 338 (N.Y. 1975)

allowing standing to plaintiffs that would be hurt by increased competition

Summary of this case from Taxicab Serv. Ass'n v. State
Case details for

Matter of Our Lady of Good Counsel R.C. Ch. v. Ball

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AND SCHOOL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 22, 1975

Citations

345 N.E.2d 338 (N.Y. 1975)
345 N.E.2d 338
381 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

Taleff Realty v. Joy

Respondent commissioner of the Office of Rent Control cites the general rule that the regulation in effect at…

Taxicab Serv. Ass'n v. State

As the owner/driver plaintiffs argue, their claim to standing is particularly acute because although…