From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orr v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 15, 1999
263 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 15, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Dylan Orr, Alden, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Siobhan S. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, YESAWICH JR., CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from creating a disturbance which disrupts the order in any part of the facility and urging a demonstration detrimental to the order of the facility. The charges stemmed from petitioner's conduct of loudly stating outside the messhall that "we ought to shut the whole * * * jail down", apparently in response to restrictions of taking food from the messhall. Notwithstanding petitioner's contention to the contrary, the detailed misbehavior report and testimony presented at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt as to both charges (see, Matter of Mendez v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 246 A.D.2d 702; Matter of Smith v. Senkowski, 245 A.D.2d 909, 910, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 813). The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that petitioner's comment raised security concerns, especially in light of the fact that there had been rumors of an inmate strike. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, testimony at the hearing establishes that other inmates were in the vicinity. Any conflicting testimony presented at the hearing merely created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, id.). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Orr v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 15, 1999
263 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Orr v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DYLAN ORR, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 502

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Lee

That determination was upheld upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. The…

Shannon v. Goord

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule…