From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of O'Leary v. O'Leary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1988
139 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

April 25, 1988

Appeal from the Family Court, Westchester County (Mrsich, H.E.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Family Court Act § 439 (e) provides that "[t]he final order of a hearing examiner, after objections * * * have been reviewed by a judge, may be appealed pursuant to article eleven of this act" (emphasis supplied).

Although the appellant initially sought judicial review in the Family Court of the Hearing Examiner's final order of support, dated July 11, 1986, he did not submit a transcript of the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 205.37 (c), despite the request of the Family Court. Consequently, by order dated September 23, 1986, the Family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), dismissed his objections, which it deemed withdrawn by the failure to pursue review. The appellant did not move to vacate the order. Having failed to timely exhaust the Family Court procedure for review of any objections to the Hearing Examiner's final order dated July 11, 1986, the appellant has waived his right to appellate review of his objections (see, Matter of Werner v. Werner, 130 A.D.2d 754). Kunzeman, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of O'Leary v. O'Leary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1988
139 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of O'Leary v. O'Leary

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOAN O'LEARY, Respondent, v. FRANK O'LEARY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1988

Citations

139 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Social Servs. v. Paulino F

Unfortunately it would be extremely ill-advised. The law is well established that the failure to file an…

Matter of Ouimet v. Ouimet

Respondent also contends that it was a denial of his right of due process for the Hearing Examiner to…