From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of O'Brien v. Steisel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1984
104 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

October 1, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rubin, J.).


Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs, determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits.

The petitioner, a tractor operator for the Department of Sanitation of the City of New York (Department), was charged with misconduct in that he demanded and accepted sums of money from two individuals in return for a promise to obtain for them union membership and jobs with the Department.

After full hearings, the petitioner was found guilty of violating rules 4(a) and 4(b) of the Department's Code of Discipline in that he demanded and accepted gratuities in connection with departmental operations or relations. He was dismissed from his position as tractor operator.

Special Term modified the determination to vacate the penalty of dismissal and provided for the imposition of a fine equal to six months' salary. The Commissioner of the Department of Sanitation of the City of New York appeals from that determination.

Since the issues raised in the petition were whether the actions of the Commissioner were arbitrary and capricious and not supported by substantial evidence, Special Term should not have decided the matter, but rather it should have transferred it to this court (CPLR 7804, subd. [g]). However, we may consider the matter as if it had been transferred properly ( Matter of Quinn v Werner, 96 A.D.2d 1079, app dsmd 61 N.Y.2d 868; Matter of Richardson v Board of Educ., 80 A.D.2d 901; Matter of King v Board of Educ., 71 A.D.2d 895.).

We find that there is substantial evidence to support the determination of the Commissioner and that the penalty imposed was a reasonable exercise of his discretion (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222).

The judgment of Special Term should be reversed, the determination of the Commissioner confirmed, and the proceeding dismissed on the merits. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of O'Brien v. Steisel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1984
104 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of O'Brien v. Steisel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MATTHEW K. O'BRIEN, Respondent, v. NORMAN STEISEL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Vega v. Coughlin

The petitioner now appeals from that judgment. The Supreme Court should have transferred the petition to this…

Matter of Murphy v. N.Y. City Transit Auth

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, the determination is confirmed, and the…