From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noto v. Fraioli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1992
184 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 29, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.).


Ordered that the appeal by Joseph P. Fraioli and June Ottinger is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing in accordance herewith.

The Supreme Court annulled the resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mamaroneck which abolished the offices of Village Attorney and Village Prosecutor after it found, upon the papers submitted to it, that the Board of Trustees had abolished the offices for political rather than economic reasons. However, the pleadings clearly raised an issue of fact, namely whether the Board of Trustees abolished the offices of Village Attorney and Village Prosecutor in good faith. Therefore, since the facts relating to this issue are disputed, an evidentiary hearing is required to determine if the Board of Trustees acted in good faith (see, Matter of Young v. Supervisor of Town of Lloyd, 159 A.D.2d 828, 829; Paese v. Pilla, 59 A.D.2d 701, affd 54 N.Y.2d 675). Thompson, J.P., Miller, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Noto v. Fraioli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1992
184 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Noto v. Fraioli

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL J. NOTO et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH P. FRAIOLI et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 769 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)