From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Muller v. Henry R. Apel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 22, 1926
152 N.E. 400 (N.Y. 1926)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1926

Decided January 22, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Jeremiah F. Connor for appellants.

Albert Ottinger, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN and LEHMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Claim of Muller v. Henry R. Apel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 22, 1926
152 N.E. 400 (N.Y. 1926)
Case details for

Claim of Muller v. Henry R. Apel, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MATILDA MULLER, Respondent, against HENRY R…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 22, 1926

Citations

152 N.E. 400 (N.Y. 1926)
152 N.E. 400

Citing Cases

Matter of State Treasurer v. Vanderbilt

) We agree with the State Industrial Board that the date of death is controlling in such case and that no…

Matter of Johansen v. Staten Island Shipbuilding

The status of the widow at that time would control. ( Matter of Muller v. Apel, Inc., 242 N.Y. 499; Donoho v.…