Opinion
April 21, 1986
Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs.
We find that substantial evidence exists in the record to support the respondent Litke's determination sustaining the charges against the petitioner (see, De Martino v. Kiley, 117 A.D.2d 702; Matter of De Bois v. Rozzi, 114 A.D.2d 848). Moreover, considering all of the circumstances, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233, 235).
We have reviewed the petitioner's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.