From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Morris v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: September 23, 1999

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Allen Morris, Rome, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., YESAWICH JR., PETERS, SPAIN and CARPINELLO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons after a search of his cell uncovered a sharpened steel rod in a sneaker under his bed. We reject petitioner's assertion that the misbehavior report contained inadequate detail to provide him with notice of charge against him because it did not specify exactly where the weapon was found (see generally, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 123). In any event, petitioner testified that he had been informed at the time he was frisked following the discovery of the weapon that it was located in his sneaker.

While petitioner asserts that other inmates had access to the area where the weapon was found, this is insufficient to negate the inference of petitioner's possession given the misbehavior report and testimony presented at the hearing, including that of the correction officer who found the weapon in petitioner's sneaker under his bed, and the inferences to be drawn therefrom. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Kennedy v. Coombe, 236 A.D.2d 726; Matter of Clark v. Coughlin, 206 A.D.2d 567). Petitioner's claim that the shank was planted merely presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Mendez v. Jones, 176 A.D.2d 423). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

CARDONA, P.J., YESAWICH JR., PETERS, SPAIN and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Morris v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Morris v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALLEN MORRIS, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 821

Citing Cases

McKethan v. Selsky

Petitioner gave contrary testimony, alleging that he did not raise his voice at any time during the incident…

Matter of Vaughn v. Selsky

The mere fact that another inmate's fingerprints may have been on the razor blade would not have defeated the…