From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mischel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1999
257 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 25, 1999.

Jacqueline M. Fitzgerald of counsel ( Thomas J. Cahill, attorney), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT


Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in this State in 1980, at the Third Judicial Department. During all relevant periods since then, she has maintained an office for such practice within the First Department.

In 1996 respondent was charged, in a superior court information in Criminal Court, New York County, with offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony in violation of Penal Law § 175.35. Respondent waived indictment and pleaded guilty to the information, acknowledging her knowing and willing intent to defraud the State by filing a false corporate tax return for 1995. On February 19, 1999 she was sentenced to a conditional discharge.

Respondent ceased to be an attorney in New York upon her conviction of a felony (Judiciary Law § 90 [a]). Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent's name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice law (§ 90 [4] [b]).

SULLIVAN, J. P., TOM, WALLACH, LERNER and ANDRIAS, JJ., concur.

Petition granted, and respondent's name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York forthwith.


Summaries of

Matter of Mischel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 1999
257 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Mischel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FELICE F. MISCHEL, an Attorney, Respondent. DEPARTMENTAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 25, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 760

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Sessler

That respondent has not yet been sentenced is not an impediment to the Committee's petition ( see Matter of…

In the Matter of Ferrandino

The fact that respondent has not yet been sentenced is not an impediment to the Committee's petition ( see…