Opinion
March 16, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Ira Gammerman, J.].
Respondent's determination that petitioner is unfit for the position of Special Patrolman is supported by substantial evidence, including petitioner's own admission that he knocked down the complainant's door and assaulted her. The nature of the incident supports the Hearing Officer's conclusion to the effect that petitioner had a threshold for violence unacceptably low for a Special Patrolman ( see, Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 443-444). The testimony of petitioner and the complainant, his girlfriend, stating that the incident was an isolated one raised issues of credibility, which were for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( supra). Finally, the determination was based on substantial evidence even though the Hearing Officer did not hear live testimony but made his recommendation on the basis of taped sworn testimony ( see, Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 120-121, 123; Matter of Butler v. Coughlin, 193 A.D.2d 973, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 655).
Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams and Rubin, JJ.