From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Application of Merwin

Supreme Court of California
May 28, 1930
209 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. Crim. 3307.

May 28, 1930.

PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure the release of petitioner from the State Hospital.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Ernest Spagnoli and Walter F. Lynch for Petitioner.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and William F. Cleary, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


Petition for writ of habeas corpus. [1] Petitioner was charged with the crime of murder. He interposed the pleas of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. Upon the first of said pleas he was found guilty by the jury of murder in the second degree, but upon his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, the jury returned a verdict in his favor. Pursuant to section 1026 of the Penal Code, and in accordance with the terms of said section, the trial court issued its order committing petitioner to the Mendocino State Hospital at Talmage, California. One year has not expired since the date of said commitment. Upon the authority of In the Matter of the Application of Mary Slayback for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Crim. No. 3306 ( ante, p. 480 [ 288 P. 769]), the petition is hereby denied and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the superintendent of said hospital.

Shenk, J., Preston, J., Waste, C.J., Seawell, J., and Richards, J., concurred.


Summaries of

In re Application of Merwin

Supreme Court of California
May 28, 1930
209 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1930)
Case details for

In re Application of Merwin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of JEROME E. MERWIN for a Writ of Habeas…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 28, 1930

Citations

209 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1930)
288 P. 774