From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Merritt v. Isbister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1926
215 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

January, 1926.


Peremptory order of mandamus reversed on the law, without costs, and alternative mandamus order directed. We are of opinion that the relator has failed to show as matter of law that the provisions of the Zoning Law prohibiting the use of this property for other than residential purposes are arbitrary and unreasonable. The parties are not in accord as to the true situation, and we, therefore, conclude that an alternative order should issue. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

See Larchmont Village Zoning Ordinance, Nov. 28, 1921, § 3, subd. 12. — [REP.


Summaries of

Matter of Merritt v. Isbister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1926
215 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Matter of Merritt v. Isbister

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of HAZEL WOODS MERRITT, Respondent, for a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1926

Citations

215 App. Div. 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)