From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Melton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 7, 1990
581 A.2d 788 (D.C. 1990)

Opinion

No. 85-1589.

November 7, 1990.

James Klein, Public Defender Service, for defendant.

John R. Fisher, Asst. U.S. Atty.

Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, for appellee.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, and WAGNER, Associate Judges.

Associate Judge Farrell has recused himself from this case.


ORDER


On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, the motion to file transcript relevant to the petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the motion to file transcript relevant to the petition for rehearing en banc is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged transcript. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of November 6, 1989, 565 A.2d 635, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before November 19, 1990.


Summaries of

Matter of Melton

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Nov 7, 1990
581 A.2d 788 (D.C. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Melton

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Tommy Lee MELTON, Appellant

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 7, 1990

Citations

581 A.2d 788 (D.C. 1990)

Citing Cases

In re Melton

On November 7, 1990, we vacated the division opinion and ordered that the case be reheard en banc. In re…

In re Herman

To be sure, the full extent to which such reliance is warranted in legal proceedings is an unsettled matter.…