From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McReynolds v. Angione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 1998
246 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

January 12, 1998


Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v. Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

Miller, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of McReynolds v. Angione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 1998
246 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of McReynolds v. Angione

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILBUR McREYNOLDS, Petitioner, v. HOWARD ANGIONE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 12, 1998

Citations

246 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
666 N.Y.S.2d 932