From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McMillan v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Greene County.


Petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing contraband. In support of his challenge to the administrative determination, petitioner argues, inter alia, that the Hearing Officer was biased and that he was improperly denied the right to be present during the search of his cell. Upon review of the record, we find that the Hearing Officer acted in a fair and impartial manner and, under the circumstances present here, it was not incumbent upon the Hearing Officer to secure the testimony of certain witnesses who refused to testify. Moreover, we find that petitioner has waived his remaining arguments inasmuch as he failed to raise them at the administrative hearing.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of McMillan v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of McMillan v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANDREW McMILLAN, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 410

Citing Cases

In re Victor Patterson

He further contends that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence.…

In re Richardson

Initially, although the nurse who authored the misbehavior report mistakenly wrote down the wrong rule number…