From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Martino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 1, 1997

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Employer Allan Martino, doing business as Any Taxi, made an application to reopen this matter so that a hearing could be held on the issue of whether Martino had exercised sufficient direction and control over the work of the individuals who leased and drove his taxis to render him liable as their employer for unemployment insurance contributions. The application was denied by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. We affirm. Whether to grant an application to reopen lies within the discretion of the Board and absent a showing that it abused its discretion, the Board's decision will not be disturbed ( see, Matter of Trincere [Sweeney], 235 A.D.2d 904). Our review of the record herein, including the reasons proffered to excuse the delay in making the application, discloses that the Board did not abuse its discretion ( see generally, Matter of Braz [Hudacs], 211 A.D.2d 938).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.,


Summaries of

Matter of Martino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1997
239 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Martino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALLAN MARTINO, Doing Business as ANY TAXI, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Pandolfi

We affirm. Absent an abuse of discretion, the Board's decision whether to reopen a previous decision will not…

Matter of Brockman

The Board further ruled that claimant failed to establish that he had "good cause" for the delay in filing…