From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marsha v. Latoya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1996
224 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 13, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On March 5, 1995, the petitioner mother Marsha C. and her daughter Latoya D., the appellant, who was then 15 years old, had an argument which escalated into a fight, during which Latoya threatened her mother with a razor and a knife. After the fight Marsha filed a petition alleging that Latoya had committed a family offense pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. After a fact-finding hearing the court found that Latoya had committed a family offense and issued an order of protection against Latoya for her mother.

The testimony given at the fact-finding hearing proved, by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 832) that Latoya intended, at a minimum, to alarm Marsha and threatened to strike her with a knife (see, Penal Law § 240.26 [harassment in the second degree]). These acts constitute the crime of harassment, and therefore the trial court not only had jurisdiction but established the elements of a predicate offense, as defined under Family Court Act § 800 et. seq., so as to warrant, by a preponderance of the evidence, a determination that the appellant had committed a "family offense".

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Hart, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Marsha v. Latoya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1996
224 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Marsha v. Latoya

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARSHA C., Respondent, v. LATOYA D., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 129

Citing Cases

Salazar v. Melendez

e must be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence ( seeFamily Ct. Act § 832; Matter of Pearlman…

In the Matter of Gergis v. Nagib

We find that these acts constituted the noncriminal offense of harassment in the second degree, a violation…