From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marcus M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 2000
277 A.D.2d 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 12, 2000.

November 6, 2000.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated June 3, 1999, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated March 2, 1999, made upon the appellant's admission, finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of menacing in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him on probation for two years.

Gabriella F. Richman, Hollis Hills, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry Sonnenshein and Russell Bogart of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ANITA R. FLORIO, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has wide discretion in entering dispositional orders (see, Matter of Tristan W., 258 A.D.2d 585; Matter of Lloyd L., 246 A.D.2d 651; Family Ct Act § 141). Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that a two-year period of probation was appropriate based on the needs and best interests of the appellant and the need to protect the community (see, Family Ct Act § 352.2).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Marcus M

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 2000
277 A.D.2d 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Marcus M

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARCUS M. (ANONYMOUS), APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 240 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 651

Citing Cases

In re Melissa N

15; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder's…