From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mabery v. Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 7, 1993
197 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 7, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County (Bradley, J.).


Petitioner was not entitled to have his New York prison sentence run concurrently with the sentence he was serving in North Carolina at the time he was sentenced in New York (see, Penal Law § 70.25; § 70.30 [2-a]). Consequently, were we to assume that respondent had an obligation to certify good time accrued by an inmate, petitioner is not presently eligible for release from his New York sentence and, given that the availability of good time credit will be based in part upon future conduct, there is no clear legal right to the relief requested. This proceeding in the nature of mandamus was therefore properly dismissed (see, Klostermann v. Cuomo, 61 N.Y.2d 525, 539; Matter of Patchogue Nursing Ctr. v. New York State Dept. of Health, 189 A.D.2d 1054).

Weiss, P.J., Mercure, Cardona, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Mabery v. Mann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 7, 1993
197 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Mabery v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRED MABERY, Appellant, v. LOUIS F. MANN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 440

Citing Cases

Matter of Mabery v. Goord

Petitioner is currently serving two concurrent terms of imprisonment, the longest of which has a maximum of…

Mabery v. Keane

Upon appeal, the Appellate Division further held that petitioner was not entitled to have his North Carolina…