From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ludwig v. Ludwig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 12, 1996

Appeal from the Wayne County Family Court, Strobridge, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In matters of child custody, "[t]he trial court's determination, based upon a firsthand assessment of the credibility of witnesses and of the character and temperament of the parents, is entitled to great weight on appeal and should not be lightly set aside" ( Lenczycki v. Lenczycki, 152 A.D.2d 621, 623). Family Court determined that, despite the ongoing depression suffered by respondent and the effects of prescribed psychotropic medications on her, the children's interests would be best served by continuing the existing custody arrangement ( see, Lenczycki v Lenczycki, supra; cf., Matter of Kamholtz v. Kovary, 210 A.D.2d 813; Nir v. Nir, 172 A.D.2d 651, lv dismissed 78 N.Y.2d 952; Matter of Huehn v. Huehn, 103 A.D.2d 884). That determination, made after "a careful and studied review of all the relevant factors", is supported by the evidence and will not be disturbed ( Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 174).


Summaries of

Matter of Ludwig v. Ludwig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1996
229 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Ludwig v. Ludwig

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEE LUDWIG, Appellant, v. SUSAN R. LUDWIG, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 471