From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lowe v. Bratton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1997
245 A.D.2d 207 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 23, 1997


Respondents' determination that petitioner made false and misleading statements in the course of an investigation and that he associated with individuals known to the department to be drug dealers is supported by substantial evidence, including testimony, which the Hearing Officer was entitled to credit, from a drug dealer who stated that petitioner purchased drugs from her on a weekly basis. The penalty of dismissal is not shocking to our sense of fairness ( Trotta v. Ward, 77 N.Y.2d 827).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Lowe v. Bratton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 23, 1997
245 A.D.2d 207 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Lowe v. Bratton

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN LOWE, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM J. BRATTON, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 207 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 618

Citing Cases

Matter of McDonough v. Bratton

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.). In light of petitioner's admissions at…

Harp v. New York City Police Department

However, dismissal and the forfeiture of pension rights simply constitute a shockingly excessive sanction…