From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Louie v. Ong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 17, 1995
211 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 17, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.).


Jurisdiction was properly vested in the Family Court since respondent received the requisite notice and warning pursuant to Family Court Act § 453 (b). Having failed to object to the Hearing Examiner's order within the statutorily prescribed 30 days, respondent has waived his right to appellate review of the order (Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; Matter of Werner v. Werner, 130 A.D.2d 754). In any case, the Family Court Judge was clearly authorized to adopt the findings and order of the Hearing Examiner without holding a new hearing (Family Ct Act § 439 [e]). Finally, petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that respondent had willfully failed to comply with the child support order (Family Ct Act § 454 [a]).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Louie v. Ong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 17, 1995
211 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Louie v. Ong

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARILYN LOUIE, Respondent, v. BING A. ONG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 495 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Oswego County Support v. Richards

Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of respondent, he was not denied his right to a hearing to present…

Matter of Cattell v. Cattell

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court was entitled to adopt…