From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lindenhurst Un. v. Tchrs. Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 1995
215 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 22, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which vacated the fourth decretal paragraph of the arbitration award, and the fourth decretal paragraph thereof is confirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as cross-appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the arbitrator to render a determination on the issue of damages resulting from the petitioner's breach of the parties' collective bargaining agreement; and it is further,

Ordered that the Teachers Association of Lindenhurst is awarded one bill of costs.

The petitioner brought this proceeding to vacate an arbitration award which, inter alia, interpreted the parties' collective bargaining agreement as requiring the petitioner to compensate nonunion Home Teachers at the same rate as union Home Teachers. The arbitrator remitted the matter to the parties to resolve the issue of damages but retained jurisdiction in the event that the parties could not resolve that issue. The Supreme Court vacated so much of the arbitration award as required the petitioner to pay nonunion Home Teachers at the contractual rate. The Supreme Court found that the arbitrator had exceeded his authority, in effect, by rewriting the collective bargaining agreement's recognition clause to include nonunion teachers.

We find contrary to the Supreme Court, that the arbitrator merely determined the petitioner's obligations pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement. The arbitrator's award was not completely irrational or against public policy, nor did the arbitrator exceed his authority (see, Matter of Fallek v City School Dist., 145 A.D.2d 482).

We agree with the Supreme Court, however, that the award is not final to the extent that it does not resolve the issue of monetary damages (see, Matter of Meisels v Uhr, 79 N.Y.2d 526, 536). We, therefore, confirm the award in its entirety and remit the matter to the arbitrator to hear and decide the issue of damages resulting from the petitioner's violation of the parties' collective bargaining agreement (see, Matter of Bongiovanni [City of Niagara Falls], 181 A.D.2d 1033; St. Martin's Hous. Corp. v Hallian Cleaners, 109 A.D.2d 687). Bracken, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lindenhurst Un. v. Tchrs. Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 1995
215 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Lindenhurst Un. v. Tchrs. Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LINDENHURST UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 22, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 321

Citing Cases

Goldberger v. Fischer

Here, the arbitration award was nonfinal, as it did not resolve the issue of monetary damages (see Matter of…

Matter of Board of Education of Amityville Union Free School District v. Amityville Teacher's Ass'n

As the petitioner correctly contends, the arbitrator's award is indefinite and nonfinal to the extent it…