From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 17, 1998

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


An initial determination finding claimant eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits was mailed to the parties on July 11, 1996. The employer requested a hearing to challenge the determination by letter postmarked August 12, 1996 and filed with the local unemployment office on August 15, 1996. The request was granted and, ultimately, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits. We reverse. Ordinarily, the 30-day period within which the employer was required to request a hearing pursuant to Labor Law § 620 Lab. (2) would have expired on August 10, 1996. Since this date fell on a Saturday, however, the limitations period was statutorily extended to Monday, August 12, 1996 ( see, General Construction Law § 25-a Gen. Constr.). Although the hearing request was mailed on this date, we deem this insufficient to satisfy the time limitation of Labor Law § 620 Lab. (2), which we have consistently held must be strictly construed ( see, Matter of Fernandez [Sweeney], 219 A.D.2d 767 Matter of Hodges [Hartnett], 154 A.D.2d 816). Inasmuch as there is nothing in the statute or its implementing regulation ( 12 NYCRR 461.2) indicating that the timely mailing of an application for a hearing is sufficient, the timeliness of such a request must be measured by the date it was filed with the Commissioner of Labor rather than the date it was mailed ( see, Matter of Michicich v. Colonial Maid Curtains, 134 A.D.2d 688 Matter of Stern v. Electrol, Inc., 18 A.D.2d 1117; compare, Matter of McLaughlin v. Saga Corp., 242 A.D.2d 393). Accordingly, the employer's hearing request in this case, filed three days after the 30-day limitations period expired, was untimely.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Spain, JJ. concur.

Ordered that the decisions are reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.


Summaries of

Matter of Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 17, 1998
253 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Levine

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MORRIS J. LEVINE, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 17, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 954 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 643

Citing Cases

Surdam v. Comm. of Labor

Although the employer's hearing request was dated within the statutory 30-day period ( see Labor Law § 620),…

In re Harroun

Although the employer's hearing request was dated and apparently mailed on September 21, 2005, it was not…